This is not a free software license, becauseit restrictswhat jobs users can use the software for. Today eCos is available under the GNU GPL withadditional permission for linking with nonfree programs. We urge people to reject programs under this license and to developfree replacements.
- It is still incompatible with the GPLbecause some modified versions must include a copy of or pointer to anunmodified version.
- Neither we nor SILrecommend the use of this license for anything other thanfonts.
- This is a free software license, not a strong copyleft, which isincompatible with the GNU GPL because of details rather than anymajor policy.
- We try to list the most commonly encountered free software license onthis page, but cannot list them all; we’ll try our best to answerquestions about free software licenses whether or not they are listedhere.
- If that is not possible for anyreason, CC0 also provides a lax, permissive license as a fallback.Both public domain works and the lax license provided by CC0 arecompatible with the GNU GPL.
- Of course, we urge you to avoid using nonfree software licenses, andto avoid using nonfree programs.
This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatiblewith the GNU GPL. This is version 3 of the license that Unicode, Inc. has applied tovarious data files and software that developers can use to helpimplement the Unicode standard in their own programs. It is alax permissive license, compatible with all versions of the GPL. This is a free software license and is compatible with the GNU GPL.Please note, however, that newer versions of Python are under otherlicenses (see above and below). It is a lax,permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNUGPL.
Upgrading Polr
We urge you not to use the Open Software License for software youwrite. Of course, they do not give you permission touse their code in the analogousway. Like the MPL, the NOSL has somecomplex restrictions that make it incompatible with the GNU GPL.
- It requires you to publish thesource code publicly whenever you “Deploy” the coveredsoftware, and “Deploy” is defined to include many kinds ofprivate use.
- If you are releasing your program under the Lesser GPL, you should alsoinclude the text version of the LGPL,usually in a file called COPYING.LESSER.
- This is the license used throughout the GNU and FSF web sites.This license provides much the same permissions as our verbatimcopying license, but it’s much more detailed.
- We recommend that you not use this license for anything you write.
- Pleasedon’t use these licenses, and we urge you to avoid any software that hasbeen released under them.
- If you’d like to advertise your use of a particular license,feel free to use one of our logos.
- However, if you want a lax, weaklicense, we recommend using the Apache 2.0 license.
GPL-Compatible Free Software Licenses
Itpermits commercial distribution, as any free license must. Please be specific about which CreativeCommons license is being used. And ifsomeone proposes to “use a Creative Commons license” for acertain work, it is vital to ask “Which Creative Commonslicense? When you see such a statement in a work,please ask the author to change the work to state clearly andvisibly which of the Creative Commons license it uses. Therefore, to say that a work “uses a CreativeCommons license” is to leave the principal questions about thework's licensing unanswered.
Versioning
It consists of the Mozilla PublicLicense version 1.1 with an added clause that permits Netscape to useyour added code even in their proprietary versions of theprogram. This is a free software license, not a strong copyleft, andincompatible with the GNU GPL. This is a free software license which is not a strong copyleft;unlike the X11 license, it has some complexrestrictions that make it incompatible withthe GNU GPL. This is a free software license; it has a copyleft that is notstrong, but incompatible with the GNU GPL. It is still incompatible with the GPLbecause some modified versions must include a copy of or pointer to anunmodified version. The license is a free software license, incompatible with the GPL.It permits relicensing under a certain class of licenses, those whichinclude all the requirements of the Jabber license.
GNU-GPLv3
Becauseof that, it is a free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL, butnot a strong copyleft. This means that software that's only available underprevious versions of the MPL is still incompatible with the GPL and AGPL. Section 3.3 provides indirectcompatibility between this license and the GNU GPL version 2.0, theGNU LGPL version 2.1, the GNU AGPL version 3, and all later versionsof those licenses. Some people call this license “the MIT No Attribution License,”but that term is misleading, since MIT has used many licenses for software andall of them contained requirements to preserve copyright notices and licensenotice. For substantial programs it is better to use the Apache 2.0 licensesince it blocks patent treachery. The eCos license version 2.0 is a GPL-compatible free softwarelicense.
However, the Apache 2.0 license is better for substantial programs,since it prevents patent treachery. However, it is risky torecommend use of “the BSD license”, even for special casessuch as small programs, because confusion could easily occur and leadto use of the flawed original BSDlicense. This is a free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL. This betory casino bonus license is a free software license, compatible with the GPL.
License
It is a freesoftware license, and compatible with the GNU GPL. However, many other countries have a more rigid approach tocopyright licenses. This is a free software license, and compatible with the GNU GPL.The authors have assured us that developers who document changes asrequired by the GPL will also comply with the similar requirement inthis license.